Skip to content

How Wild Apricot reconciliation works

A reconciliation report answers one question: did everything from Wild Apricot actually come across? This page explains what the numbers on that report mean and why some rows can’t be drilled into.

The report compares a source total from Wild Apricot against a target total from what actually imported, for contacts, memberships, payments, donations, and event registrations. A difference is always described by direction — “3 fewer in target” or “$5 under source” — never a bare number, so you know at a glance whether something was missed rather than added.

Only contacts are counted on the MapleGather side today (updated 2026-11-01). The report counts the contacts your imports created. Memberships, payments, donations and event registrations always show 0 on the MapleGather side: the report doesn’t count them yet, and payments, donations and event registrations aren’t imported from Wild Apricot yet. Those rows show the whole Wild Apricot total as a difference until that’s built — the difference doesn’t mean records were lost.

Every row on the report has a source value (what Wild Apricot reported) and a target value (what imported into MapleGather). If you pulled your data through the Wild Apricot API, the source totals come from the counts MapleGather already captured during that pull — there’s no need to check Wild Apricot again. If you imported by file, you enter the Wild Apricot totals yourself from your own export summary.

When a row’s source and target don’t match, it’s flagged, and the report states the direction of the difference in plain language rather than a raw signed number — an accountant reads “under” and “over” more naturally than a minus sign. Most rows also let you drill in: a list of the specific records behind the difference, with a reason like a missing email address or a duplicate that was skipped, so you can go fix the source data and re-import rather than guess.

Some rows can’t be drilled into. When Wild Apricot only gives you an aggregate total for something — with no way to see the individual records behind it — the report says so plainly rather than pretending to offer detail it doesn’t have. This isn’t an error; it’s an honest limit of what the source data can tell you, and it points you to a manual check instead.

Money and membership counts are the numbers your board or finance team will ask about first after a migration. Stating differences by direction, and being upfront when a number can’t be broken down further, means the report never quietly hides a gap or implies precision it doesn’t have.

  • A row can show more records or a higher amount imported than the Wild Apricot source reported. This is unusual, but the report still surfaces it rather than only flagging shortfalls.
  • The report is read-only — running it, or exporting it, never changes your member or payment data.
  • Exporting a very large report may take a little longer and finish in the background; you’ll see a link to download it once it’s ready.